![]()
Your Friend & Mineby Warren Swartz |
9/7/98
I have been asked, and agreed, to write a regular column for
"As Maine Goes." Since this is my inaugural effort, I'm
just going to tell you what I have on my mind this morning.
When I woke up at 5:00 AM, the sound of church bells was coming
through my open window. I swear I could also hear Chopin's
"Prelude in C Minor" in the background. The
"Prelude" is best known as a funeral dirge and it
occurred to me that what I was hearing was the sound of the
Clinton presidency heading for the cemetery, for as things stand
now, it doesn't matter anymore much whether he resigns, is
impeached, or allowed to finish his term in office, his
presidency is, for all practical purposes, over.
Shortly after Clinton's election back in 1992, my wife and I were
traveling out to California by auto and I saw a sign on the
interstate advising me to take the next exit to visit Hope,
Arkansas. Since I needed fuel and a snack, and I was curious
about Bubba's birthplace, I decided to take a break and visit the
place. Rest assured that Hope, Arkansas, isn't much more than a
dot on the map, but I was curious, so we swung off the highway.
We pulled into one of those joints, right on Main St., that offer
quick fuel and snacks, but this one also had an attached car
wash. As I was filling up my tank, the owner spied my Maine
plates and my bumper sticker reading "Clinton-Gore, Gone in
Four" and came out to chat.
He said that he just loved that bumper sticker, so much so that I
could have a free car wash. He went on to express his disbelief
that a man like Bill Clinton, whom he described as "white
trash," could ever have been elected to the highest office
in the land. He told me that the nation, to it's profound regret,
would soon learn what most Arkansans, at least those who could
read and write, (and in Arkansas, there were not that many of
them) already knew-Clinton was a sleaze, and except for a deep
desire to hold elective office, was without standards of any
kind. I really didn't know much about our newly elected president
at that time, but I was a bit stunned by the attack.
But as time passed and Clinton became better known to me, I
realized that the man was essentially correct. As 1998 draws to a
close, it is becoming more and more evident that "white
trash" is a rather appropriate, if short, description of the
man from Hope. The Lewinsky affair, while certainly not the most
serious damage this president has visited on this nation and the
office he holds, ("Chinagate" will wind up holding that
title) is absolutely disgraceful. And just think, Starr hasn't
even issued his final report yet.
It is my belief that Sen. Orrin Hatch, the guy with the real
tight, real stiff shirt collars, is responsible for bringing
Clinton down. Hatch, on one of the Sunday talk shows, was the
first major political figure to say that if Clinton would only
come clean and tell the truth about the Lewinsky affair, the
American people would be willing to forgive and forget and the
whole thing would blow over. Clinton, dumb cluck that he is, took
the bait and made a confession (at least his version of one) and
an apology in the now famous four minute speech. Once he did
that, his defenses were gone and the sharks, of both parties,
began circling the water.
You know, he really could have continued to stonewall the whole
sordid affair, even in the face of the DNA evidence on the famous
blue dress, right? After all, they had all kinds of DNA evidence
on OJ Simpson and he's still a free, although not very popular,
man. I think Hatch conned Clinton, which I don't believe is very
hard to do. The mass media claims Clinton is very bright, but you
can't prove it by me. I mean how smart is it to make (75) phone
calls to a lover other than your wife right from your own house,
all the while knowing that a special prosecutor is watching you
like a hawk?
It seems incredible, but the "Wag the Dog" explanation
of our missile attacks on Sudan and Afghanistan is becoming more
viable with each passing day. An AP story last week made it
apparent that Clinton himself, rather than Pentagon officials,
chose the targets for the attacks, and a Boston Globe editorial
(9/5/98) titled "The Wrong Target in Sudan" points out
that Sudan's destroyed al Shifa plant really was engaged in the
manufacture of harmless pharmaceuticals, laxatives for the most
part.
Meanwhile, Clinton called off random inspections of suspected
sites in Iraq so as to avoid another confrontation with the man
who actually is producing weapons of mass destruction, Saddam
Hussein. Can anyone explain that for me?
Warren Swartz is a noted Maine newspaper columnist who writes for the Biddeford Journal-Tribune. |