![]()
R.O. Voight
The Deluge of 1999
1/10/99
sovrov@nemaine.com
Yes, the legislative flood of 1999 is real, damaging, and
overwhelming the State Legislature. Never before has the State
Legislature been faced with so many proposed laws! 2900! Can you
imagine yourself being one of them, serving on a committee, and
being faced with reading, understanding, determining the validity
of that many pieces of draft legislation ?
Somehow the process has gotten out of control. This number of
draft legislative pieces should somehow be screened, filtered, or
diminished before the legislators have to confront each and
everyone. Ask yourself, do we as citizens really need that many
new laws? Are we as citizens in need of that much government
control over our lives? How have we lived this long without these
2900 laws? Is state government out of control?
These proposed laws cover every thing from milk to meat to trees
to ecological reserves to motors on the Allagash. Of special
interest to many is the vast number of proposed laws on the
forests of Maine. Last year they passed LD 2286 which established
unbelievable detailed control of harvesting trees in the Maine
Woods. And yet this year there are some 45 proposed new laws on
forestry and related land use!
It is obvious that the enviros have created and submitted to
willing legislative sponsors many of these proposed bills. And
many are trying to reinstate issues that failed in the two
Compacts. Typical Bills are:
Then there are two bond issues:
Several years ago, the Inspector General of the Department of
Interior investigated The Nature Conservancy (TNC) and their land
practices. They reported that many of the TNC land purchases were
resold to the government at a profit. TNC act as an agent for the
government until the government can obtain the funds to make the
purchase. There is a local documented case where TNC purchased 60
acres in Washington County to prevent private development, and
then resold the land to the government for Moosehorn Wildlife
Refuge expansion.
For the past ten years, here in Maine, the enviro national and
state groups have strategized to take our private forest land by
deception, by regulation, by law. Every year, there has been an
onslaught. The most recent and most publicized was the Governor's
Compact in 1996 and 1997. Due to strong and persistent grassroots
opposition these efforts have not yielded the desired enviro
results. So, beginning this year, they have made a major change
in their overall strategy.
They are now planning, budgeting, and gathering funds to buy the
land! The first example is the recent purchase by TNC of the
185,000 acres in western Maine. There are three bills in the
United States Congress that propose to provide funds to purchase
our land. The bills are:
These are of course national funds to purchase land in any of
the fifty states, however, Maine is the priority one target! This
federal support can only give strength to the enviro thrusts and
plans to take our land for their own purposes.
Here in Maine, we have the two bond issues, mentioned above to
provide $ 100 million and $ 120 million respectively, for the
purchase of forest land. Yes, the deluge is coming !
Property right activists have continually screamed about the
Constitutional right to have land paid for, compensate! They have
correctly defended their rights of property ownership when
threatened by politically inspired laws and regulations. Well,
now the enviros are convinced they have to change their strategy,
and they now plan to buy what they want. Thus, the land owners
must change their defense !
What is the defense against this willing seller/ willing buyer
mechanism? What flag should the property rights activists rally
around now? There is another valid issue that prevails, that is
another nemesis of private land. Private land is the fundamental,
rigid, irreplaceable cornerstone of our democratic free society.
As Samuel Adams said in 1772, "The absolute rights of
Englishmen and all freemen, in or out of civil society, are
principally personal security, personal liberty, and private
property."
And in 1821, John Adams said, "The moment the idea is
admitted into society that property is not as sacred as the laws
of God, and there is not the force of law and public justice to
protect it, anarchy and tyranny commence."
The concept of removing private land from our tax rolls, and
making it "public" land is anathema to our concept of
freedom and individual ownership. Nowhere is public land managed
as well as private land. The greatest example of degraded public
land is in Russia, where all land was public. That land is now an
environmental disaster.
The federal government now owns more land than our Founding
Fathers ever envisioned. Just look at the feverish upset, and
disturbed citizens and their legal battles out West over public
lands. Our grassroots issue in Maine is now "public
land" and all that issue entails!