Another BDS liberal goes on a shooting spree

53 replies [Last post]
Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

There was a shooting just outside the Pentagon today, at a security checkpoint. Two cops were injured; reports say the suspect, has died.

And Internet research shows that the guy was a 9/11 Truther and an anti-Bush nut case.

Pentagon Shooter: Anti-Bush Nut Case and 9/11 Truther

I think you'd be hard-pressed to ignore the pattern over the last few weeks. The fact is that liberals, unglued to start with, are coming unraveled as they see that the "ideal government" of liberals they created isn't working as they had hoped, and isn't solving their problems.

Professors shooting up staff meetings, Bush-deranged protestors flying planes into IRS buildings, learning that the Anthrax mail terrorist was an Obama supporter, and families committing suicide-murder under the panic of imminent global warming ...

Can you imagine if even ONE of these events was caused by a tea party protester? We'd have Homeland Security cracking down on gun owners, Nancy Pelosi tearfully bemoaning the lack of civility from the conservatives, demands for the Fairness Doctrine, and the media shouting these stories 24/7 wall-to-wall.

But it is NOT the conservatives doing this.

It is the liberals.

Islander
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 21 min ago. Offline
Joined: 02/13/2009

Good thing they were not in a gun free zone we probably would have many more dead.

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

If it was a federal building, it was a gun-free zone. It was the armed security that returned fire.

Anyway, I'm glad no one was hurt except the shooter.

Well, Keith Olbermann was hurt.

Amy Bishop, Joesph Stack, now this guy.... I don't know if Keith can afford to lose many more viewers.

Naran
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 52 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/06/2004

From the other thread - as to the shooter being a liberal:

Eagleisland wrote:

Bollocks. There are nutballs on the far right who buy into 9/11 conspiracy theories, too. Crazy is crazy, and crazy crosses party lines.

***********

Well said.

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Well said.

You wish.

Bush Derangement Syndrome is the giveaway - plus he was a registered Democrat - this guy was a moonbat liberal.

Your guy, liberals.

Henry Clay
User offline. Last seen 24 weeks 2 days ago. Offline
Joined: 11/01/2004

Investigators were still trying to determine a motive for the brazen shooting and began trying to unravel a bizarre series of Internet postings that suggested Bedell was fascinated with conspiracy theories, computer programming, libertarian economics and the science of warfare.
Link

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

"the currency of the United States should be marijuana."

Bingo - Liberal.

A wingnut would have demanded a gold standard.

Jonathan Read
User offline. Last seen 3 days 18 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 06/20/2005

the guy was anti-government and pro property rights...

I think it's fair to say he was nuts and espoused views on both sides, which was probably part of him being crazy.

scoring points saying he's a lib or a cons. on either side is dispicable.

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

It's a big deal if he was a tea party guy - or COULD BE a tea party guy - but when it turns out he has left-leanings, then suddenly it's NOT IMPORTANT, and "how dare you bring that up!"

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Look, the MSM is already painting the guy as a tea party guy, even though it's a LIE.

I'm just making sure people know the facts.

Bob MacGregor
User offline. Last seen 15 hours 31 min ago. Offline
Joined: 12/13/2003

The Christian Science Monitor is part of the "main stream media"?

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Definately. Ask any journalism guy.

They used to be the best paper in the country.

FNG
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 09/10/2004

Tom, why are you so hung up on the liberal/conservative thing? Is that really the most important aspect of everything? This was an American shooting at Americans. It is disturbing to me that the first thought that went through your mind was "I hope it was a liberal", as I'm guessing it was. The problem you have is that you truly believe there are two sides only, and everything has to fit on one of those sides.

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Hey, it's not just this guy. If this was an isolated incident we could say; "that's too bad!"

But it's not an isolated incident. It's part of a reign of terror by liberal mass-murderers that's sweeping the country.

Well, fortunately, they're mostly wannabe mass-murderers.

charlie neville
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/17/2005

The guy is/was a nutcase; utterly insane! Your posts dwelling on left wing/right wing crap indicate you may be too Tom.

charlie

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

OK, so I guess it's only worthy of mention if he MIGHT HAVE BEEN connected with a conservative group.

Suddenly, when it turns out the guy is a leftie loon, it's "insane" to even mention what political leaning he might have had.

Got it.

charlie neville
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/17/2005

Regardless of his political affiliations, he was nuts is my point. Affiliations are yet to be determined so far as I can tell. Not that it matters a whole lot. Left wing whaco's are just as whaco as right wing whaco's.

charlie

Naran
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 52 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/06/2004

Amen.
***********

Mar 5, 6:12 PM EST

Pentagon shooter had a history of mental illness

By TRACIE CONE and BROOKE DONALD
Associated Press Writer

HOLLISTER, Calif. (AP) -- The man who opened fire in front of the Pentagon had a history of mental illness and had become so erratic that his parents reached out to local authorities weeks ago with a warning that he was unstable and might have a gun...

It's still unclear why John Patrick Bedell opened fire Thursday at the Pentagon entrance, wounding two police officers before he was fatally shot.

Source

*********

Another case where the parents tried to sound a warning, and got nowhere.

BC-SPM
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 30 min ago. Offline
Joined: 04/21/2008

One of the most common denominators among the more seriously mentally ill individuals out there is the connection with the "government". It can range from such off the wall stuff as the "government" exercising remote control over them, being wired into CIA computers, to obsessive beliefs centered around conspiracies about hiding aliens, 200 mpg carburetors, to being followed and spied upon, and lots more I could tell you about. Most of these folks are harmless, but enough of them are significantly unhinged that we have to take them seriously and worry about the what ifs.

During my police career I had to deal with literally hundreds of such folks, some were taken in for evaluations voluntarily, lots were involuntarily, some committed for extended stays. Not once did I ever hear any of them describe their political affiliation as Dems, GOP, Green, Communist, or even drop clues about their political leanings for that matter. To somehow tie the violent actions of people with a serious degree of mental illness to a political party, or even left vs right wing leanings, is without any merit whatsoever. Mental illness does not discriminate.

IMO the main issue is how this person with such a medical history was able to obtain the gun in the first place. Where was the breakdown? Who, or how many, dropped the ball on this guy?

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Pentagon shooter had a history of mental illness

Another strong indicator he was a liberal.

charlie neville
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/17/2005

Good link Tom, thanks. It's also another strong indictor you're as screwed up as the people cited.

thanks

charlie

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

And you got your doctorate in psychiatry exactly where, Charlie?

charlie neville
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/17/2005

A sophomore psychology course is enough to diagnose your obsession, Tom.

charlie

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

And how to classify yours, Mr. Neville?

charlie neville
User offline. Last seen 7 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 10/17/2005

Yeah, guess I'm obsessed with debunking your ignorant posts, Tom. You got me!

Stop making dumb ass posts and I can move on.

charlie

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Look, I'm just warning people. Someone reading might know a liberal, and they should know that the guy could go berserk at any moment. Just watch out.

FNG
User offline. Last seen 1 week 4 days ago. Offline
Joined: 09/10/2004

Thanks for the warning Tom, but we're watching out for you.

Uljas
User offline. Last seen 1 year 26 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/29/2009

I think an important point might be that he was carrying a concealed weopon . Who issued his permit since we all know he couldn't have been carrying without one ?

johnw
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 36 min ago. Offline
Joined: 03/11/2009

An earlier post ststaes "One of the most common denominators among the more seriously mentally ill individuals out there is the connection with the "government". It can range from such off the wall stuff as the "government" exercising remote control over them, being wired into CIA computers, to obsessive beliefs centered around conspiracies about hiding aliens, 200 mpg carburetors, to being followed and spied upon, and lots more I could tell you about. Most of these folks are harmless, but enough of them are significantly unhinged that we have to take them seriously and worry about the what ifs."

When does that become anyone who disagrees with the government or vocalizes their doubts about the veracity of the government becomes a "nut?"And the over the edge types who are in control decide that all of these "nuts" need some sort of special guidance or confinement?
Oh no I'm sounding a little paranoid myself............

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

We've been hearing for the last year that the tea party members are "full of hate" and "violent extremists" and warnings from homeland security about "home-grown terrorism." The commies at the Southern Poverty Law Center are giving dire forecasts about the "explosion of anti-government groups" and the supposed danger to the public from that.

Well, when folks are worried about the possibility of conservative mayhem, it's supposedly a big deal.

But suddenly when the evidence shows the wave of home-grown terror is coming from the LEFT, then everyone lines up to shoot the messenger.

Also, who can be oblivious to the vast wave of misinformation in the media and elsewhere tying these people to conservative groups:

Fox News Supports Potentially Violent Tea Party Goers and Business Guru Neil Cavuto Warns of Infiltrators

Tea Party: Becoming violent?

Recent violent attacks sparked by anti-government anger

etc, etc.

You guys think you're clever taking little cheap shots at me for pointing out the FACTS, while at the same time you seem to be immune to the vast cloud of lies that is surrounding you, and building in intensity.

thejohnchapman
User offline. Last seen 6 hours 8 min ago. Offline
Joined: 03/21/2000

"When does that become anyone who disagrees with the government or vocalizes their doubts about the veracity of the government becomes a "nut?"

Answer: When a tinfoil hat is needed to keep the government laser beams from infiltrating one's thoughts.