Authorities: Boy shot while trying to burn Gorham home

23 replies [Last post]
Bob S
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 24 min ago. Offline
Joined: 07/15/2011

If you remember, Gorham has had more than their share of arsons lately.

Gorham Police said today that the male teen is being treated for what they believe to be non-life threatening injuries after being shot at a residence at 8 Mountview Drive. Police said the homeowner and a witness interrupted the teen as he attempted to set a fire at the home, which was occupied at the time. Police did not specify who shot the juvenile.

Authorities: Boy shot while trying to burn Gorham home

Oh, oh, the homeowner must be one of those right wing patriotic wackos. I don't understand why the paper felt the need to add the following.

At 8 Mountview Drive, a black sport utility vehicle with a National Rifle Association sticker was parked in the driveway. A basketball hoop was set up, and the Bassingthwaites displayed an American flag.

woodcanoe
User is online Online
Joined: 02/22/2005

Unless Maine law has been changed in the last few years, attempting to set on fire an occupied building, gives those inside the right to use deadly force as torching the occupied building could easily kill those occupants.

WC

taxfoe
User is online Online
Joined: 03/22/2000

That's crazy talk, Bob S.!

Bruce Libby
User offline. Last seen 42 min 51 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 01/17/2006

Initial response Good!
Bad thing is the little demented criminal will be handled by a juv. justice system that considers him as one of those kids who isn't a bad boy!

Joe Redneck
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 01/11/2001

if the kid is still alive then the homeowners need a bigger gun or more practice on the range. We will be paying for this one for a very long time.

Bob S
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 24 min ago. Offline
Joined: 07/15/2011

We will be paying for this one for a very long time.

How so?

BC-SPM
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 04/21/2008

Title 17-A, ยง104. Use of force in defense of premises
2. A person in possession or control of premises or a person who is licensed or privileged to be thereon is justified in using deadly force upon another person when and to the extent that the person reasonably believes it necessary to prevent an attempt by the other person to commit arson.

Looks justified so far.

Gaffer
User offline. Last seen 59 min 14 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 12/11/1999

Good for the homeowner. We need more of this and perhaps the bedwetting liberals will finally get the message that we loyal and hoinest hardworking Americans are fed up with the " poor baby" BS.

Dennis
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 53 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/07/2006

I think Joe means that likely if this person does survive the monetery costs of his medical treatment and his living from this point forward will be on the taxpayer's nickel--local, state, federal or all of the above.

Apollo
User offline. Last seen 12 hours 47 min ago. Offline
Joined: 08/19/2004

Bob, I couldn't believe they actually put the part about having an NRA sticker and flying an American flag. A blatent attempt by the writer to use the story to attack gun owners. I sent a link of the article to Drudge, Malkin, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and Ingraham. I hope they bring attention to it.

Bruce Libby
User offline. Last seen 42 min 52 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 01/17/2006

This appears to be more personnel ,I bet the little pyro didn't make the team or some such thing!!!

I emailed reporter at paper and asked if she would have described SUV if it had "I support same sex marriage" sign on it ?????

Apollo
User offline. Last seen 12 hours 47 min ago. Offline
Joined: 08/19/2004

I have a Romney sticker and a Tea Party sticker on my car. Maybe I should remove them?

Stephen Carmichael
User offline. Last seen 9 hours 33 min ago. Offline
Joined: 06/19/2008


I fly the Continital Flag, some call it the Bunker Hill Flag, but most people don't even know what it is anyway.

Bruce Libby
User offline. Last seen 42 min 52 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 01/17/2006

Apollo do not think you have to worry in all likehood there are many other items described by and to alert fellow liberals who you are. !!!! lol

Islander
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 55 min ago. Offline
Joined: 02/13/2009

Maybe by describing the car and its stickers the reporter was warning criminals to stay away from houses like this and that it would be much safer to look for a Prius with an Obama/Biden sticker along with a rainbow sticker.

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 7 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

I sent a link of the article to Drudge, Malkin, Limbaugh, Hannity, Beck, and Ingraham. I hope they bring attention to it.

Did you also mention to those folks that Democratic Representative Chellie(!) Pingree's husband owns that paper?

This is great. Every stupid thing the paper does, and there will be plenty, will now be able to be placed right at Chellie's(!) door.

lol.

Next time a liberal gets mugged, I fully expect the Portland Press Herald to describe in detail all the lame bumper stickers on the victim's car.

Gaffer
User offline. Last seen 59 min 15 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 12/11/1999

Well there was a bit more info in todays PPH regarding this incident. The boy apparently had a vendetta with a boy who lived in the home. The attempted arson was to the porch and the gun used was a shotgun.
This raises even more questions in my mind. Shooting at someone on your porch with a shotgun could very easily be fatal. A shotgun up close is extremely dangerous. If he had gotten off the porch and started to run away then he was shot in the back. In the old days they would have used rock salt and let the distance be great enough to allow the salt pellets break the skin and drive home the point that you had done something very wrong.
As is usual the media does a very poor job of reporting what really happened. We probably will never know the truth until someone who was present speaks out.

woodcanoe
User is online Online
Joined: 02/22/2005

A "porch" is part of a house. Any fire on the porch would very likely torched the entire place. It is my understanding that if someone is attempting to burn an occupied dwelling, that those inside have the right to use deadly force.

I am not sure just where the young man was when he was shot, whether he was on the porch, or running away, which might make a difference. But, when he picked up a can of gas, and matches, and decided to burn an occupied dwelling, he took a hand of cards in a very dangerous game.

The courts will likely decide if the shooting was justified or not, but what are you supposed to do if you catch an arsonist in the act of torching your home, with you and your loved ones in it?

No question what I would have done.

WC

Tom C
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 7 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/03/2006

Setting fire to someone's home is a stupid, dangerous act, and the act of a psychopath. This wasn't kids tipping cows or teepeeing or egging the house.

While that, in itself, may not have been adequate reason for giving the little punk a severe peppering, I think under the circumstances the homeowner was justified, and I feel little sympathy for the arsonist who I suspect has only started his long career of crime and social parasitic behavior.

Calvin
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 7 min ago. Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001

I don't understand why the paper felt the need to add the following.

At 8 Mountview Drive, a black sport utility vehicle with a National Rifle Association sticker was parked in the driveway. A basketball hoop was set up, and the Bassingthwaites displayed an American flag.

Well Bob S., here's my spin;
Typical liberal ( how do we blame the right wing ) spin. First , "MOUNTVIEW", oh! they are those Mountain people! Freedom fighting mountain people. Bad, bad.
"Black utility vehicle" just in case they have to make a run for it in the rough country. bad. bad.
"NRA" see, I told you so. guns, guns, guns. bad, really bad.
Basketball hoop, nice place to hang fresh deer kill. bad,bad. ( Poor Bambi) Also a pro American sport. would have been better to see signs of tennis or co-ed naked LaCrosse.
American flag, the symbol of everything that liberals hate. BAD,BAD, really BAD.

The press is liberal and this is the indicator of how they think.

Naran
User is online Online
Joined: 10/06/2004

Bets on how long it takes for the boy's parents to sue the homeowner, or the person who shot him?

Rumor says the shooter may have been an alert neighbor, not the homeowner.

Abacus
User offline. Last seen 4 hours 33 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/14/2011

Calvin, you've got it wrong:

The "Mountainview" piece denotes money, since most people cannot afford such an affluent location.

Otherwise you're spot on.

Calvin
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 7 min ago. Offline
Joined: 05/15/2001

Jeepn, my bad. You're right. But I fool'em. I drive a Volvo. ( think about that for a minute and the political picture it draws.)
A silver Volvo, '94, no wheel covers, NRA sticker, 257,000 miles, nothing electrical on it works right, and it has a value of at least $750. ( but it still rides like new)

Anyway, it is disturbing how un-necessary info sifts into a news report that has nothing to do with the story.

Mike G
User offline. Last seen 1 hour 4 min ago. Offline
Joined: 02/17/2000

I have a Romney sticker and a Tea Party sticker on my car. Maybe I should remove them?

At least one of them Apollo, make up your mind. :)