Baldacci Plan to Close $438M Budget Gap; GOP Response
- Login to post comments
NOTE: This item’s also posted for discussion on page 21 of this ongoing thread here.
Governor Baldacci Presents Plan to Close $438 Million Budget Gap
December 18, 2009
Governor's Office
AUGUSTA – Governor John E. Baldacci today released the details of his plan to close a $438 million budget gap created by declining State revenues.
“We are beginning to see signs that the economy is recovering,” Governor Baldacci said. “But unemployment remains high, consumer confidence is low, incomes are down and people remain uneasy. This national recession has been the longest and most severe since the Great Depression, and we feel it at home and at work.”
The plan closes a $209 million gap in fiscal year 2010 and a $174 million gap in fiscal year 2011 created when the Revenue Forecasting Committee revised its projections on Dec. 1. It also accounts for $25 million carried forward from fiscal year 2009. In addition, the budget appropriates $30 million for increased costs within State government.
Earlier this year, the Governor and Legislature addressed a $569 million budget gap with the passage of a revised $5.8 billion State budget. Since Dec. 1, 2008, State revenues for the current budget have been reforecast down by $1.1 billion.
With the revisions submitted today, the two-year budget will fall to $5.5 billion. Funding for education, including higher education, accounts for 50.5 percent of the General Fund. The Department of Health and Human Services, including MaineCare, represents 28.6 percent. The remainder of State government represents 20.9 percent.
“These are unprecedented times,” Governor Baldacci said. “We must balance the State budget at the same time that the recession is placing increased demands upon government to assist families in need.”
The 2010-2011 budget is the first in at least 35 years to be smaller than its predecessor. For context, in 2004 General Fund appropriations totaled $2.64 billion; in 2011, the budget is now proposed at $2.66 billion.
The Governor’s plan includes reductions across government, a placeholder for increased federal assistance and the use of one-time tools to bring the budget into balance. No tax increases, new fines or fees are included in the budget revisions.
“We must reduce spending, but government still has a responsibility to its people,” Governor Baldacci said. “While we are making significant cuts, we are also working to mitigate them by giving local governments and schools the tools to lower costs.”
The plan reduces funding for:
• K-12 and higher education;
• The Department of Health and Human Services, including rate reductions for many MaineCare service providers;
• All State departments and agencies;
• Municipal Revenue Sharing;
• Critical access hospitals by reducing the reimbursement rate from 109 percent of MaineCare allowable costs to 101 percent;
• The Legislature and Judiciary.
The plan also:
• Adds three State government shutdown days (one in FY 2010; two in FY 2011);
• Increases scrutiny of assets as part of MaineCare eligibility and reduces eligibility income levels for Circuit Breaker;
• Creates a new tax collection program to recover old debt owed to the State;
• Utilizes excess reserves to the retiree health system without impacting benefits or system solvency;
• Recognizes $13.5 million in savings from the hiring freeze implemented by the Governor and savings from lower Workers’ Comp rates;
• The Maine Department of Transportation will reorganize its workforce, making it more adaptable and flexible;
• Supports the continued consolidation of county jails and State correctional facilities through the Board of Corrections;
• Consolidates and reorganizes the workload within the mental health program in DHHS to better utilize medical staff;
• Restructures Child Development Services within the Department of Education from 15 regional sites to nine;
• Establishes a process to reorganize the four natural resource agencies (Agriculture, Conservation, Inland Fisheries and Wildlife, and Marine Resources) and to reorganize the Department of Economic and Community Development;
• Reorganizes the bureaus within the Department of Agriculture from four to three.
“We must continue to streamline and reduce the size of State government,” Governor Baldacci said. “We cannot use limited resources to support unnecessary administration. Instead, every dollar possible should be directed toward providing services to the people of Maine. We all must recognize that we can’t afford the comfortable structures of the past. We must be willing to chart a new course.”
In addition, the plan transfers balances from Other Special Revenue accounts to the General Fund and shifts the due date or timing of payments for several State-funded programs to achieve one-time savings.
“We have used one-time tools to mitigate cuts in education, public safety and health and human services,” Governor Baldacci said. “This budget revision makes important structural changes to government that will produce ongoing savings, but it would have been much too severe to close the entire gap with cuts alone.”
In addition, the budget revisions include $3.5 million to flat-fund the Board of Corrections at 2010 levels in 2011 and $1.75 million to partially reimburse municipalities for the State share of disaster assistance.
The plan includes a $35 million placeholder for an anticipated increase in federal support for MaineCare.
“I have spoken directly to the Vice President and the White House economic team about this issue. They have assured me that this is a priority for the President,” Governor Baldacci said. “I believe our estimate is conservative, and that the President and the Congress recognize the need to extend the higher match rates originally adopted as part of the Recovery Act for at least six months. If, however, Washington does not act, I am prepared to take the necessary steps to keep the budget in balance.”
Further supporting the placeholder, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a jobs bill Wednesday night, which includes a six-month extension of the MaineCare funding, in addition to other aid to states. Negotiations are ongoing in the U.S. Senate.
The budget revisions include 44 position eliminations. Since 2003, the State government workforce has been reduced by nearly 1,000 positions, not counting approximately 150 positions that were frozen as part of a retirement incentive created in the spring.
“Unemployment is already a major concern,” Governor Baldacci said. “We worked hard to limit the number of layoffs. Unfortunately, it was necessary to increase the number of government shutdown days by three. State workers have been asked to do a lot. They’re being asked to do more.”
In the last seven years, State government has gotten smaller and more efficient.
Reduced school administrative districts, the unification of county jails and the State corrections system through the Board of Corrections, consolidation of administrative and IT functions within State government and the consolidation of the Department of Health and Human Services are saving millions of dollars for taxpayers while delivering higher quality services.
“My budget proposal includes hard choices and shared sacrifice,” Governor Baldacci said. “It’s a road we have been down before. But we have never lost sight of our core values, and we won’t lose sight of them now. We will maintain the essentials and support job growth. And when our economy begins to escape the shackles of this recession, we will be better positions for recovery.”
The text of the budget can be found at: http://www.maine.gov/budget/
The Governor’s prepared remarks for the release of the budget today follows.
Good afternoon.
We’re having these budget get-togethers a little too often.
And the news, it seems, gets a little worse every time.
As we approach the holiday season, the details of our country’s economic plight are front and center.
And the impact goes beyond the numbers and the bar graphs we’ve all become accustomed to.
Unemployment and economic uncertainty are taking an increasing toll on our economy and on our families.
It has devastated people looking for work, and hangs like a dark cloud over people who are working.
Consumers are worried about their jobs and their health care.
Businesses are moving with caution and aren’t investing.
Incomes are down.
This national recession has been the longest and most severe since the Great Depression, and we feel it at home, and at work.
Since just last year, Maine’s revenues have been re-forecast down by $1.1 billion dollars.
Most recently, projections for the rest of 2010 and 2011 were reduced by $383 million dollars.
Taken with a liability from 2009 and with increased funding demands within State government, we must close a gap of $438 million dollars in our current budget.
As I worked on developing this plan, I considered a list of priorities that would help guide my decision making.
My plan would work to lessen the impact on education, public safety and health, and our most vulnerable citizens.
Given that education and health and human services account for about 80 percent of the General Fund budget, there’s no way those areas could avoid serious reductions.
But I sought to reduce the impacts and give communities greater flexibility to reduce their costs and to focus their resources on the classroom where they do the most good.
I wish I could say we have eliminated all the hardships in this budget, but we’ve not.
There are difficult cuts, and we will have to continue our efforts to make government leaner and more efficient.
I also wanted to avoid including things in the budget that could unnecessarily hurt job creation or hamper economic recovery.
My plan does not increase taxes, fees or fines. I do not believe that working families and businesses can afford a greater burden.
I’ve always said that a good job is the best social service program, and the family is the best social service agency.
I have tried to find a path forward through these challenging times that protects both.
We are beginning to see signs that the economy is recovering, but states haven’t escaped the grips of recession.
Like Maine, more than 30 states are seeing revenues below projections for this year.
Earlier this year, Maine passed a $5.8 billion dollar two-year budget.
It was the first time in at least 35 years that a two-year State budget was smaller than its predecessor.
With the revisions I am submitting today, the budget will fall to $5.5 billion dollars.
To put that in perspective, seven years ago my first budget was about $5.4 billion dollars.
During that same time, we have increased funding for education by hundreds of millions of dollars – even though we have seen student enrollment drop by about 20,000 students.
We have restrained the rest of State government.
With today’s revisions, education spending now accounts for more than half of the General Fund of the State budget.
Health and Humans Services is 28.6 percent.
And the rest of State government is 20.9 percent.
Our priority remains our State’s children, our neighbors who need help, and public health and safety.
During these unprecedented times, we must balance the State budget at the same time that the recession is placing increased demands upon government to take care of people and families in need.
While funding for Medicaid has been held almost flat and well-below the national average for growth, the program is serving 20,000 more people.
Other programs, like food assistance and unemployment, have grown, and more and more people have fallen on hard times.
But we have no choice. We must reduce State spending further.
Today’s budget revisions include cuts across all agencies and departments in State government.
It reduces municipal revenue sharing, makes changes in provider rates, and adds three additional government shutdown days – taking the total to one per month.
The budget revisions contain a roadmap forward to achieve efficiencies through greater cooperation and consolidation of natural resource agencies.
It realigns the Department of Economic and Community Development to make the agency less centralized and more responsive.
It streamlines the delivery of Child Development Services in the Department of Education from 15 sites to nine.
The Maine Department of Transportation will reorganize its workforce, making it more adaptable and flexible.
It reduces the number of bureaus within the Department of Agriculture from four to three.
And it includes an internal consolidation within DHHS to better utilize medical staff within the mental health program.
These efforts build upon our successes in other areas.
We have already achieved increased efficiencies and savings through:
• The consolidation of the Department of Health and Human Services;
• The consolidation of administrative and IT functions within State government;
• The unification of the administration of county jails and the State corrections system through the Board of Corrections;
• And through school administrative district reform.
But we must make government more efficient.
We cannot use limited resources to support unnecessary administration.
Instead, every dollar possible should be directed toward providing services to the people of Maine.
I’ve been down this road before, and I know that change is difficult and is often met with opposition.
But we all must recognize that we can’t afford the comfortable structures of the past. We must be willing to chart a new course.
We know we can do it.
Consider the Board of Corrections.
Prior to its creation, county jail costs were growing at an average of 9 percent annually and the State adult corrections budget was growing at 5 percent.
Under the unified system, county jail budgets grew by 1.8 percent in 2009 and half of 1 percent in 2010.
Saving property taxpayers millions of dollars.
And there were even bigger reductions in the adult corrections budget.
The Board of Corrections has saved millions of dollars in state and property taxes.
And it deserves continued support, which is why my budget includes $3.5 million dollars to fund the in 2011.
With this funding, the Board can continue to make the changes necessary to keep our corrections system as a model for performance and government efficiency.
Even as we have worked to reduce costs, we have also maintained our focus on quality. All of Maine’s State prisons are highly rated and accredited by the American Correctional Association, an impressive accomplishment.
While my budget contains many difficult cuts in spending, I have also used several one-time tools to reduce the impact of closing a $438 million budget gap.
We will achieve significant budget savings by utilizing excess reserves in the retiree health plan that we have built up in earlier years.
The proposal does not threaten the solvency of the fund and will not impact retiree benefits.
We have also included a $35 million dollar placeholder for increased federal support for Medicaid.
I have spoken directly to the Vice President and the White House economic team about this issue. They have assured me that this is a priority for the President.
In addition, the U.S. House of Representatives passed legislation Wednesday night that includes additional Medicaid funding and other assistance to states.
I believe our estimate is conservative, and that the President and the Congress recognize the need to extend the higher match rates originally adopted as part of the Recovery Act for at least six months.
If, however, Washington does not act, I am prepared to take the necessary steps to keep the budget in balance.
This is a prudent, responsible and measured approach that avoids causing unnecessary harm and anxiety.
We also will shift the due date or timing of payments for some State programs, which will help avoid worse options.
I have proposed significant ongoing budget reductions that will begin saving money now and save even more in the future.
These one-time tools are a better alternative than additional, painful cuts.
I began today talking about the impact high joblessness is having on our people and on our economy.
Unemployment is a major concern, and we have worked hard to limit the number of layoffs included in this proposal.
The budget revisions include 44 position eliminations, and also recognize $13.5 million dollars in savings from the hiring freeze I implemented.
Since 2002, the State government workforce has been reduced by nearly 1,000 positions, not counting the retirement incentive created in the spring.
We have shutdown days, and State workers have lost merit raises, longevity pay and must now contribute to the cost of their health insurance.
State workers have been asked to do a lot. They’re being asked to do more.
These men and women make easy targets for critics and skeptics alike.
But they are the police on the beat, the search and rescuers, the first responders and compassionate care givers.
They keep us safe, help to create and protect jobs, and make sure that government is working for the people.
You can talk about government in a lot of ways, but essentially it is how we, as a people, deliver upon the promises we have made to one another.
Regardless of political party, we all want a good education for our kids, to help our neighbors who are struggling and to expand economic opportunity.
Those are the basics. We have to protect them.
My budget proposal includes hard choices and requires shared sacrifice.
It’s a road we have been down before.
But we have never lost sight of our core values.
And we won’t lose sight of them now.
We will maintain the essentials, and support job growth.
And when our economy begins to escape the shackles of this recession, we will be better positioned for recovery.
We will have a leaner, more efficient government built upon a foundation of fiscal responsibility.
The days and weeks ahead will be difficult. The politics of an election year will be hard to avoid.
But I know that if we are able to put aside partisanship, as we have in the past, and focus on the job at hand, we will be able to do the work we were elected to do.
Thank you.
Bravo to the republican response - we are still poised on the edge of a cliff, it's just a matter of time until we fall.
Cuts to education and revenue sharing but the Governor promises "no tax increases" Please, what a joke. Hang on folks...if you thought property taxes were high already....hang on!
Overall a really unremarkable proposal. The response is about as expected. See it is all the cost of government fault i.e. employees benefits. Hooray Mr. Raye and Tardy you have responded with crusading inertia and fiery indecision!
Look I support shutdown days as an alternative to other actions but Gov. let's cut the crap with your employees are being asked to do more. That is Bull S___ ,no employee is being asked they are being told. OK , if they don't like it they can quit. fair enough. Mr. Tardy and Raye should really be paying attention to the Board of Corrections
beause in the end it is the largest transfer of of costs onto the county tax payers that has not appeared yet.
But it will. Yes we have aved some marginal cost food etc. by housing an inmate in a county for a few weeks.
Yet , I am getting paid to surpvise 2 units that could hold 96 each but are limited to 85 and lately have less.
It is all smopke and mirrors. When Mr. Raye and Tardy comeout and say welfare fed. guidlines nothng more
I will believe they have something to propose.
Gov. 38 heralds the factthat his prisons are accredited. Yes we have standards we minimally meet them.
For 17.63 an hour one of my tasks is to weigh a gallon of latex paint after some has been used to meet a standard!
And these guys think my benefits are screwing the tax payers. Ask DOC how much ACA cost the state the last 6 years. I will tell you it was one hell of an expensive plauge on wall.
By the way not one ACA standard has anything to do with how we deal with inmates.
Itis time for our minority side to get a set in Augusta.
TM: You have to expect aid to towns and schools to be cut because such aid makes up such a large portion of the budget. I do not think there is any legitimate complaint about such cuts unless they are not proportionate to their share of the budget.
Though it will not be easy, I do not expect a property tax increase in Bowdoinham this year.
I find it ironic that people were worried about cuts to school funding if TABOR passed. (snork) I think we ought to start ranting and raving that the party in control of the purse strings wants little johnny to be shivering in a cold class room, so cold he needs to wear mittens.
Same old CRAP ! Increase the tax burden on the towns or force them to do the firings while telling them they are getting accountability in Augusta . I didn't see any cuts in Dirigo mentioned so I guess we'll keep throwing cash into that money pit . Also what does reducing workers comp rates mean ? Is that reduced rates employers , including state, pays in , or does it mean reduced amount state pays out ? I 'm glad to see we can still reach into the magic money box in Washington to bail us out and it won't increase our taxes any . I always thought using a different credit card to pay off the first one was sound fiscal policy . Glad to see I have verification from the wise money managers in Augusta.
So after all the previous rhetoric about having cut spending to the bone magically there is more that can be cut.
I like to see some posts from the supporters of baldacci and the dem majority of this defending their previous lie.
So after all the previous rhetoric about having cut spending to the bone magically there is more that can be cut.
I;d like to see some posts from the supporters of baldacci and the dem majority defending their miscalculations
Dan my issue isn't so much with the cuts to education and revenue sharing as it is with the Governor and his administrations claims of "no tax increases". I think he should be honest with the people. He should say, "I am proposing these cuts in state government and there may be a need to raise local property taxes because of it, but that is beyond my control."
What would be so wrong with just telling the truth?
The truth is local governments can also make cuts. Tax increases are not inevitable.
Agreed, but there are exceptions to every rule. I just think it isn't completely honest to issue a "no tax increaese" statement without clarifying that it is possible that some taxes that the Governor admitedly can't control, may increase because of the shift of burden. I think it is a diservice to the citizens to say cuts will be made and no increases will happen. All the cards should be on the table.
TM - all Gov 38% is doing is the same thing we see from all such MMA-indoctrinated folks. Yourself included, on occasion.
PASS THE BUCK.
Only, in his case, it's pass the "five hundred million bucks."
ps - Dan is correct. Your town, just like all the others, will have the choice to ask for more in benefit contributions from staff; cut salaries or positions; freeze salaries; eliminate bonuses; cut or defer spending, etc. There's always a way in which services can continue to be provided without raising taxes. The question is how much you want to do it - not whether it can be done.
Tm, people are just going to have to be vigilant on the local level. Too often I see school board and councilors re-elected because they were unopposed. Auburn is a perfect example. Sadly, I must say, my councilor ran unopposed, and we just gave the teachers big money a couple of months ago. :-(.
Can towns increase property taxes mid year? Most towns bill twice a year Sept and March. They would have add it to the March bill. But, can they legally set a new commitment for the year?
Steven Scharf
SCSMedia@aol.com
No holiday receptions at Blaine House this year
By SUSAN M. COVER, Kennebec Journal December 19, 2009
AUGUSTA — There's been far less holiday cheer around the Blaine House this year, thanks to the state budget crisis.
As a result of lagging revenues, Gov. John Baldacci... canceled the holiday receptions annually held at the Blaine House.
"This year, the governor and first lady decided that, given the budget circumstances, it would be inappropriate to have holiday receptions,"...
Too bad he doesn't seem to "get it" regarding the state spending plans on Dirigo, too.
Towns can issue supplemental assessments in the middle of the year, though it almost never happens.
The cuts proposed would impact school and towns in a big way in the next fiscal year.
Actually the school cut for FY 2011 $35 million vs $38 million for this year so the cut will have been taken this year. The $35 million does not jive with the $852 million GPA approriation so it may be more, but the math is only off by $10 million.
Steven Scharf
SCSMedia@aol.com
It would be a very cold day in Maine if a town went back for a supplemental due to a cut from the State.
Face it folks, if you work for the state, today is as good as it will have ever gotten. The downturn has begun. We didn't get the sweet heart deal that bought and paid for Nebraska's vote in the Senate. We in Maine will see massive shifts in funds coming from the state to pay for Medicaid mandates. Expect less funds for the welfare state. We will be on our own and if we raise taxes much more, we will crush Maine’s working class.
I am convinced the recession is over...and the depression has begun.
re: the health care tax increase during a depression. Absolute insanity.
I see there are no takers on defending baldacci and the dems previous rhetoric of having cut spending to the bone.....oh where are those liberal warriors for truth , equality and justice for all??
A liberal, when confronted with facts and reality, retreats into the ether of "hope and change."
A Rep. Responce?
Well I suppose it would to much for anyone to outline things that would deter this from happening again
instead of a careful review of budget!
Though it will not be easy, I do not expect a property tax increase in Bowdoinham this year.
Does this include the education budget or is that not part of a tax increase in Bowdoinham??
My prediction is about the whole tax rate -- municipal, school, and county.
I expect a small increase from the school that we will be able to handle without a tax increase.
What is the loss of State REvenue sharing to the 'ham?
Both the last 5 months of this year and next year? I assume the Town uses that revenue in the year that it is received to reduce the tax rate?
For various reasons, Bowdoinham has seen its annual revenue sharing drop off by about 25% over the last 5 years. For the current fiscal year, our budget included an estimate of $212K in state revenue sharing. (Municipal budget is $1.4 million and total assessments are $4.2 million.) I am not sure what the cut will be, but the total revenue is small so a cut can't kill us. We budgeted other revenues, including excise tax revenue, very conservatively so I expect we will make most of those numbers. We had an $80K overlay for this year, which will cover any loss in revenue sharing this fiscal year. We also have a $25K contingency fund on the expense side that will probably not be used. As a result, through conservative budgeting and careful management, the Town will be in the black for this fiscal year without much trouble.
For next fiscal year, we have about $60K from the overlay built into the existing tax rate that is not really needed. That gives us a small cushion. The school folks know they can't look to the taxpayers to make up for the lost revenue. I expect an increase from the school, but nothing that will kill us. We will also probably look to borrow for some capital expenses that we would usually fund through the budget. We have a low amount of debt so we can do that responsibly. We will have to be creative and make some tough choices but I expect the mill rate to remain flat. I'm not saying it will be easy, but I expect that to be the result.
We have made lots of wise choices over the last 4 years that allows us to get through these tough times without burdening the taxpayers. If we were in the horrible shape we were in when our last manager went on to bigger and better things, we would be looking at a big tax increase.
Towns are just like families. If you live within your means and save for a rainy day, you can get through tough times. If you don't act responsibly, you will be in a mess.
So, did the budget overtax people by $60,000 this year in the overlay because it was not needed? Is that really being conservative? Will the Town do it again this year, if not, where will you be in 2011? Don't misconstrue, I agree with what the Town did, it just seems hypocritical from a conservative to overtax people in a single year to make plans for the next year. Perhaps you did not agree with the strategy but now can benefit from it?
Bowdoinham has used the overlay to build up the fund balance to the level recommended by our auditors. It is still not quite at that level, but is now pretty close. We also realized that there was a good possibility that revenues would drop during the year and an overlay is a way to prepare for that. Though the overlay is set by the Selectmen, this strategy has been publicly discussed and the whole process has been transparent. The estimate of the overlay was in the budget materials presented to the town before town meeting.
The tax rate over the last three years has been $14.50, $14.80, and $14.80.
It could have been lower this year but we were planning ahead and did not want to cut the rate one year and have a big increase the next. A level and sustainable tax rate is what most people want.
By the way, if we did not have such a large overlay, I expect that the tax rate would have stayed the same and less money would have been borrowed for capital expenses. As we found savings during the budget process, we used that money to reduce borrowing.
To put our decisions in context, the municipal budget is only $2500 higher this year than it was 4 years ago. I think that shows we have been pretty conservative.
I also think it is conservative to plan ahead.
- Login to post comments

House & Senate Republican Office
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
December 18, 2009
Legislature’s GOP Leaders React to Governor’s Budget Changes
Credit Governor for Avoiding Tax Increases
AUGUSTA – Following is the statement released jointly by Senate GOP Leader Kevin Raye and House GOP Leader Josh Tardy in response to the Governor’s supplemental budget proposal:
“We believe the Governor deserves credit for his refusal to include tax increases in the supplemental budget. But we need to thoroughly explore the details of the budget. We are particularly concerned about proposals that would push the state’s budget problems to the next Governor and the next Legislature, and further burden municipalities.
The fact is state government is still poised for a catastrophic fall off the financial cliff when the federal stimulus comes to an end. While the stimulus has helped to achieve short-term balance in the state budget, it has also tied our hands in making the decisions necessary to establish long-term savings.
Mainers shouldering the burden of the high cost of government are themselves struggling to feed their families, keep a roof over their heads and keep up with the bills. They cannot afford to pay for benefits that are oftentimes better than what they earn themselves.
As we move forward, Republicans in the Legislature will work to achieve a responsible and affordable state government.
###