Feds Tout National Fish Passage Program

7 replies [Last post]
Editor
User offline. Last seen 15 hours 47 min ago. Offline
Joined: 04/18/2009

Contact:
Chris Tollefson
chris_tollefson@fws.gov
703-358-2222

A Dam Success: The National Fish Passage Program Helps
Restore Streams, While Benefitting People and Local Economies

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and community partners across the
nation worked together to remove or bypass 158 dams, culverts and other
structures in 2011, opening more than 2,180 miles of streams to native
fish populations. These efforts, coordinated through the National Fish
Passage Program, have also contributed to improved water quality, provided
additional recreational and economic opportunities, and even addressed
serious threats to human health and safety.

“The National Fish Passage Program serves as a vital catalyst for
grass-roots community action that not only benefits native species and
habitat, but also contributes to local economies and addresses aging and
sometimes dangerous infrastructure,” said Service Director Dan Ashe.
“Everyone wins when rivers and streams are allowed to flow freely again –
that’s why this program is so popular and successful.”

Documenting these successful efforts, the Service released its 2011 Annual
Report for the National Fish Passage program this week. The report, which
can be viewed at http://www.fws.gov/fisheries/facilities/nfpp.html ,
provides dozens of stories and examples of projects completed in the past
year that have provided tremendous benefits to fish, wildlife and local
communities.

The National Fish Passage Program, administered by the Service, is a
voluntary initiative active in all 50 states. The non-regulatory program
addresses barriers that limit fish movement vital for their survival. Fish
passage is gained by removing dams, replacing poorly designed culverts,
constructing low-water crossings, and installing fishways. These projects
are done in close cooperation with state and federal agencies,
non-government organizations, universities and supporting individuals.
Program staff identifies, prioritizes, funds, designs and reviews these
conservation projects, while working closely with a wide variety of
programs and partners to provide technical support to local communities.

Since the program’s creation in 1999, the Service and more than 700
project partners have removed 1,118 barriers to fish passage, reopening
17,683 stream miles to access by more than 90 native species of fish and
freshwater mussels and reconnecting nearly 120,000 acres of wetlands to
their historic water sources. In turn, these projects have contributed an
estimated $9.7 billion to local economies and supported nearly 220,000
jobs.

From the earliest days of the American colonies, people have sought to
harness streams and redirect them to provide valuable services such as
irrigation, power production, drinking water, flood control and
transportation. As a result, millions of culverts, dikes, water
diversions, dams, and other artificial barriers have been constructed to
impound and redirect water flowing through every river system and
watershed in the nation. While many of these structures continue to serve
a purpose, thousands of them are obsolete, abandoned or deteriorating.

An estimated 74,000 dams alone dot the American landscape, thousands of
which are small dams built decades ago that no longer serve a purpose.
These structures impede the passage of native fish and destroy spawning
habitat, as well as degrading water quality by preventing stream flow that
flushes sediment and pollutants out of river systems. They also reduce
fishing and other river-based recreational and economic opportunities for
people. And in some cases, aging dams threaten downstream communities
should they fail, or otherwise endanger human life and safety by creating
dangerous drowning conditions.

For example, the town of Front Royal, Virginia worked with National Fish
Passage Program staff to remove an abandoned low head dam on the
Shenandoah River that was the site of multiple drownings. This “drowning
machine,” as it was called locally, was removed in October, 2011, enabling
residents and visitors to enjoy fishing, canoeing and swimming on a safer
river.

And in the Klamath Basin of Northern California, the Service worked with
the Karuk Tribe, the Forest Service and local watershed and salmon
restoration councils to restore fish passage on ten miles of the Klamath
River. Completed in 2011, the project identified and addressed 48 barriers
to fish passage in this stretch of the river. And by using tribal youth to
do much of the work, it provided summer jobs to dozens of young men and
women and introduced them to potential careers in fisheries science.

“As this project and many others like it demonstrate, the National Fish
Passage Program is also an avenue for young adults to develop skills and
confidence that will help them throughout life, whether they pursue a
career in conservation or not,” said Director Ashe. “We are very grateful
to the Service employees, partners and communities who have done so much
to make the Program a monumental success for both people and wildlife.”

For more information on the National Fish Passage Program and its
accomplishments, or for how to apply for funding and technical assistance,
visit http://www.fws.gov/fisheries/facilities/nfpp.html .

The mission of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is working with others
to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their
habitats for the continuing benefit of the American people. We are both a
leader and trusted partner in fish and wildlife conservation, known for
our scientific excellence, stewardship of lands and natural resources,
dedicated professionals, and commitment to public service. For more
information on our work and the people who make it happen, visit
www.fws.gov. Connect with our Facebook page at www.facebook.com/usfws ,
follow our tweets at www.twitter.com/usfwshq , watch our YouTube Channel at
http://www.youtube.com/usfws and download photos from our Flickr page at
http://www.flickr.com/photos/usfwshq

-FWS-

News releases are also available online at
http://onlinepressroom.net/fws/

Doug Thomas
User offline. Last seen 1 day 3 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 08/29/1999

These people couldn't be more wrong. We're tearing out dams on the Penobscot river to allow fish to swim upstream freely. The problem is there are Northern Pike in the Penobscot that are going to be traveling upstream as well, and they'll destroy native fish populations. We can say good bye to the Trout and Salmon in all the water opened up by removing these dams. The only way to contain non-native species in our rivers is the dams they're so proud of removing.

The loss of all the cheap renewable electricity the dams should be generating is not going to help our economy no matter what they say or how loud they say it.

BlueJay
User offline. Last seen 5 hours 44 min ago. Offline
Joined: 04/18/2005

"From the earliest days of the American colonies, people have sought to
harness streams and redirect them to provide valuable services such as
irrigation, power production, drinking water, flood control and
transportation."

All an important part of our infrastructure. Does it make sense to be tearing this out? Clean, renewable energy? Of course not!

And this travesty..." in the Klamath Basin of Northern California, the Service worked with
the Karuk Tribe, the Forest Service and local watershed and salmon
restoration councils to restore fish passage on ten miles of the Klamath
River."

To save a sucker fish.
The truth of this story is found here. http://online.wsj.com/article/SB996104722513232077.html

This article is well worth the time to read. The US Fish and Wildlife Service using its most effective weapon against man. An incredible example of "rural cleansing".

Ugenetoo
User offline. Last seen 1 week 1 day ago. Offline
Joined: 08/05/2011

The devil (as always) is in the details.
Case in point;
The new Mike Michaud Multi-use trail in Millinocket was delayed due to the fact that the USF&W declared that ALL the culverts that were used on the $625,000 23 mile trail were in violation of the fish passage laws, and ALL of them had to be removed and replaced with bridges so that the fish didn't experience the un-natural, man made water course bottom.
If this wasn't a crock of sh%$, I don't know what would qualify.

Roger Ek
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 6 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/18/2002

Doug nailed it. These fresh water sharks will go all the way to the headwaters of the Piscataquis, Penobscot, Passadumkeag and Mattawamkeag. They will really like any future Atlantic salmon smolts.

Henry Simmons
User offline. Last seen 2 weeks 13 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 11/14/2010

I'm in agreement with the skepticism expressed so far in this thread.

The feds are simply following their "pre-programed" policy initiative which traces it's roots back to the UN Agenda 21.

That being stated, I'm curious to know if there is a compromise that could be had, at least in regards to the remaining dams on Maine rivers. Is is possible to engineer and construct a fish ladder on any of these rivers alongside the dams?

One area which has used a fish ladder next to an electricity generating dam, successfully, has been in Damariscotta Mills. I'll grant you it's relatively small, but couldn't this idea be explored further on other rivers?

The Mills restoration effort has a website I submit for consideration:
http://damariscottamills.org/restoration.html#about:blank
(this is the "slideshow" page).

Butch Moore
User offline. Last seen 22 hours 11 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/20/1999

Doug, you're dead on in your assessment.

Mainelion
User offline. Last seen 1 day 23 hours ago. Offline
Joined: 08/11/2005

The LAST thing these groups want us to have is cheap, reliable energy. That would result in more people living in Maine; the exact opposite of their agenda.