Mayor's Budget Veto Threat Sets The Tone For How LePage Will Govern Maine
- Login to post comments
For Immediate Release: April 14, 2010
For More Information: Press Secretary Mike Hersey or Brent Littlefield at (207) 692-6865
WATERVILLE - As the only Republican candidate for Governor to have been elected and re-elected multiple times in a community with an overwhelming Democrat voter registration edge, Mayor Paul LePage is once again standing by his principles and proving why his governing philosophy works with the voters.
The Waterville City Council recently supported a budget that would increase taxes. Mayor Paul LePage's clear message in response: no new taxes in this tough economy. LePage's veto threat came in a letter he issued to the council.
LePage has a record of lowering taxes and at the same time improving the books for the city. During his tenure as Mayor of Waterville, he has helped cut property taxes without sacrificing any city services. The city's fund balance has increased from $1 million to $10 million and the credit rating has been upgraded from A-Minus to A-Plus.
LePage attributes his success as a chief executive of Waterville government to his personal life story where he was homeless at age 11 and learned to do more with less rising up to become the chief executive of Marden's stores where they build new stores only when there is money in the bank to pay for the next store. Under LePage Marden's has grown to employing more than 1,000 people.
LePage's budget veto threat was as follows:
2010-11 Budget Message
By Mayor Paul LePage
I have reviewed the 2010-11 budgets along with additional suggested cuts proposed by Mr. Roy and Mr. Boschen. The Administration faced a daunting task in preparing this year's budget. However, we need to recognize that all sectors of our society are facing extremely tough economic pressures. I commend them for the fine effort, and further acknowledge all our residents and taxpayers face similar unsympathetic economic times.
If ever there was a time to do more with less, this is the time. We must be responsive to the need for providing services to our community, while achieving a balance in thoughtful assessment of taxation to our taxpayers. The ability to pay tax increases has become as increasingly difficult, as making spending cuts has been to the Administration. However, if we are to recover from these difficult times, we must share the load.
As difficult and unpopular as it has been in the past, I recommend the city Park & Recreation programs be merged into the Alfond Youth Center programs. Cost savings realized at this level can be shared, by providing some additional funding to the Youth center. This would help solidify both the city and the Youth Center. If grants allow, I would support using grant funds to replace police cruisers. At least until the economy recovers to 2007 levels, I recommend we not fund the school resource officer.
Rather than having furlough days, I would reduce the labor force to 104 equivalent full time employees and curb overtime wherever possible. Reduce the contingency reserve to bare minimum and place a moratorium on all city wage increases. The cost of labor increases should come directly from other areas of labor to fund this liability. I would place a moratorium on all festival funding until the economy improves at least to 2007 state funding levels. Finally, I believe it is high time the city begins contracting out services to the private sector on at least a 60 - 40 split. This would lower the cost of overhead for the city and provide badly needed work to local contractors, while maintaining a self-sufficiency level.
My concern is if the city increases its taxes without making some of the sacrifices that everyone is asked to make, we will delay the recovery and cause further hardships to our taxpayers. I believe under current economic conditions both at the federal and state levels; we need to find more cuts in expenditures. Again, while I commend the Administration for preparing a rigid budget, I feel more cuts are needed to meet current fiscal conditions.
Therefore, I will not support a budget that calls for increasing taxes. Some will argue that we need to maintain services at current levels; however, I argue our mil rate continues to be too high and increasing taxes is indefensible for the city to realize growth and prosperity as the economy improves. We all need to sacrifice, the state has, our residents have, and the city must, in order to maintain the current trend of taxation. This problem is not going away; next year will be as difficult as this year. We must take action now, or see our tax rate return to days of yesteryear.
Paul LePage has a Personal Life Story Of Success; homeless at age 11, he put himself through high school, then college and went on to become a major Maine success story. He is a Leader In Maine Business; the only candidate for Governor to currently serve as the leader of a major Maine business, successfully creating jobs and growing Maine's economy as the chief executive of Marden's stores. He is the only candidate for Governor who has successfully served as the Chief Executive Of A Government; Paul LePage cut taxes, eliminated budget waste and red tape, improved services, and fixed the debt rating being elected and re-elected as a Republican in overwhelmingly Democrat Waterville due to his governing success.
He has my vote to have that chance in Agusta.
Mayor LePage would make a wonderful governor. He not an elitist, that's for sure. And, he's got a track record of success in both business and government.
The other Republican candidates are good people but, Paul LePage has demonstrated that he can get elected AND RE-ELECTED in a Democrat city. If you're serious about a Republican taking the governorship, LePage is the one you need to get behind.
C'mon he's not the annointed one. How can he possibly be elected without the backing of the elites?
The whole play the victim thing is tiresome.
You wouldn't think a popular, three-term Chief Executive would have to threaten vetoes if he was so successful.
This whole tear down the popular outsider thing is tiresome.
Nothing but positive comments in this thread until you repeated the campaign's lame talking point.
I am sure they are already working on blaming others for their lack of fundraising success when the next reports come out.
There will always be those who will say "we must raise taxes" It is refreshing to know there are still politicians who will say, "we must not raise taxes on an already over taxed people"
In June one individual will be the focus. Bickering prior to that and trashing other individuals choices for candidates, although natural, is not productive. Many of the individuals who have subjected themselves to the hard work and sometimes thankless returns have good ideas and a lot to say when they are out there campaigning. Once someone is elected it is up to us, we the people, to hold them to their campaign promises, not to mention to uphold their oath of office.
What I find peculiar is that even the democrat candidates campaign as fiscally responsible...but most never legislate that way, and they are not and have not been held accountable for their actions. The people, have been asleep at the helm...hope they wake up before this ship of state sinks.
I agree. The attitude of the LePage supporters will make it very hard to unite the party if Paul is the nominee.
I hope that is not the case Dan. When I registered as a Republican it was because of the party platform. It is good. It is morally and fiscally acceptable to me. If the individual elected officials adheared to that platform I dare say Republicans would have had the majority now and Maine would be in far better shape. Maybe I am naive, but I think when you have a platform that is based on smaller government, lower taxes and more individual responsibility you should probably not go on wild spending sprees and create new social dependency programs. I registered to support people that espoused the views of that platform and Paul LePage is one of them.
Paul has my vote and support.
Besides Mills and Otten, any Republican candidate would probably be in the ssme position on taxes and spending, why then do some annoint one candidate as the one to accomplish this?
Having observed the LePage campaign I see a campaign strategy to move forward with the support of angry, marginalized voters.
The view that Mr. LePage is a "common man" is a bit hard to swallow. I have no idea who is managing his campaign or serving as his Treasurer but I am thinking a little looking under the hood will find some pretty well established political folks, not a grass roots management team at all. Just my hunch.
And just maybe he is really a real S.O.B. who could do it in Augusta.
The talk now is similiar to how the Longley disparegers still talk of him!!
I am undecided as of yet.
An invitation to a neighborhood Abbott fund raiser,$25 thank you , was turned down.
The question becomes does Waterville equate to the rest of Maine?
Not spending until having money does in some ways.
But source of the money is the difference.
Dan,
If Abbott loses, how do you think it will impact the GOP in Maine?
It depends upon who wins. If the nominee is Mills or Otten, it will be a disaster. But the others could be OK, though I have great concerns about LePage's ability to raise money.
I agree about Lepage..At one point I thought it was his to lose....Now I sense that it is wide open.
- Login to post comments

During his tenure as Mayor of Waterville, he has helped cut property taxes without sacrificing any city services. The city's fund balance has increased from $1 million to $10 million and the credit rating has been upgraded from A-Minus to A-Plus.
If he could do only 1/16th as good a job in Augusta, wouldn't that be a wonderful thing.