Murtha ~ Marines killed Iraqi civilians 'in cold blood'

288 replies [Last post]
Anonymous

A US lawmaker and former Marine colonel accused US Marines of killing innocent Iraqi civilians after a Marine comrade had been killed by a roadside bomb.

"Our troops overreacted because of the pressure on them and they killed innocent civilians in cold blood," John Murtha told reporters. The November 19 incident occurred in Haditha, Iraq.

KERRY CALL

Snowalker
User offline. Last seen 7 weeks 6 days ago. Offline
Joined: 01/13/2000

So let's give em a medal and put them on the Mexican border .......

jemhunter
User offline. Last seen 18 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 08/21/2005

Someone has installed a "dummy" button on Murtha's mouth. He sure made headlines in all the muslim press around the world. He wasn't there and seems to think he is a judge that can try and convict a soldier because of his positions. Shame on him.

The Distributist
User offline. Last seen 21 min 56 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 05/15/2005

NBC Promotes as 'New' Murtha's Stale Charge About Marines Killing Iraqi Civilians

On the six month anniversary of Democratic Congressman John Murtha's successful publicity stunt call for the U.S. to withdraw from Iraq, Wednesday's NBC Nightly News jumped on the chance to highlight Murtha's charge that last November some Marines deliberately killed more than a dozen innocent Iraqi civilians. But in treating Murtha as some kind of authoritative figure making “new allegations,” NBC ignored how the fairly well established as accurate charge (pictures exist of the immediate aftermath and three Marine officers were relieved of their commands) is old and has already been widely-reported -- including on the March 20 NBC Nightly News.

Tom C
User is online Online
Joined: 01/03/2006

From the article: ""These guys are under tremendous strain -- more strain than I can conceive of " and "This is especially true when a fellow soldier has been killed. "Once you reach that point, all sorts of restrictions you may place on yourself are removed,"

Doesn't sound like "cold blood" to me.

I wonder why Murtha used that term?

Perhaps he was LYING?

knucklehead
User offline. Last seen 5 weeks 5 days ago. Offline
Joined: 02/13/2004

When I hear things like this I wish we would bring back dueling.

Mike G
User offline. Last seen 2 hours 25 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/17/2000

Snowalker wrote:
So let's give em a medal and put them on the Mexican border .......

Good point Snowalker, we could use a bit of non-pc, you are not my world, for solving our border issues.

Anonymous

I am starting to feel bad for Ltc. Murtha. He has done such harm to himself that there are no retired of former officers coming to his aid, his defence, or even trying to come to his aid anylonger.

He and his office will nolonger take calls from men who served with him or kenw him. As a matter of fact, his officve has reverted to actually raising their voices and lying to men who call and ask to remind him of one thing or another.

Ltc. Col Murtha, like Major Longley has lost his grass routes support and any and all credibility within the retired and former officer and NCO corp. I feel bad for him. A moments glory and a lifetime of being shunned by those he served with.

Anonymous

Murtha still flapping his gums but has nothing to say about the enemy.

wv_republican
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 59 min ago. Offline
Joined: 11/23/2004

Murtha, the new "John Kerry" Do you think he's positioning for a run at the presidency with backing from the anti-US anti-military left?

Mike Beardsley
User offline. Last seen 3 hours 18 min ago. Offline
Joined: 01/26/2005

The above is just anonther reason why people should support Diana Irey in November http://www.irey.com/

There is also a great Political Cartoon about this race: http://www.patriotart.com/posted/index.htm

LMD
User offline. Last seen 30 min 53 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2003

Thank you for the link, Mike.
A contribution is on its way in honor of my father - in hopes that Ms. Irey successfully topples Murtha and sends him home for good.

Chris Coose
User offline. Last seen 57 min 18 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 11/04/2003

Probably the only guy in town willing to tell the truth.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

Before you all go piling on to Murtha more, maybe you ought to read this.

Quote:
Investigators believe that their criminal investigation into the deaths of about two dozen Iraqi civilians points toward a conclusion that Marines committed unprovoked murders, a senior defense official said Friday.

Link

More from Reuters

LMD
User offline. Last seen 30 min 53 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2003

Sorry you feel that way, Country.

Let's let the investigation go forward and if any Marines are found guilty, justice should and will be served. Don't worry, if guilty these men will be punished severely.

Until then, Murtha should shut his big, whimpering mouth.

Any true Marine would.

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 27 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

What about the Iraqi unit working with the Devil Dogs that day. The MSM conveniently ignores.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

LMD wrote:
Sorry you feel that way, Country.

Let's let the investigation go forward and if any Marines are found guilty, justice should and will be served. Don't worry, if guilty these men will be punished severely.

Until then, Murtha should shut his big, whimpering mouth.

Any true Marine would.

Since you know what a "true Marine" is, I assume you served in the Corps? John Murtha volunteered to go to Nam and got a bronze star (with combat V) and two purple hearts while there. I wonder if you're fit to shine John Murtha's boots.

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 27 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

Can you "de-Marine" someone?

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

Never seen it happen, Bob. I was Navy. All the "ex-marines" I've met never lost their spirit of having served in the Corps.

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 27 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

Same here. If you go through what those guys and gals do to join the Corps, how can you blame them?

I think Murtha has gone "daffy". To many brain cells killed in the Officer's Club maybe?

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

I been paying attention to Murtha since he said we should get out of Iraq. He's probably visited more people at Walter Reed (that are there because of Iraq) than anyone. I've heard him tell the stories of those visits. It's been getting to him. He knows combat and he knows what comes of it. Like the subject of this thread.. he said those Marines in Iraq lost it. He knows.

LMD
User offline. Last seen 30 min 54 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2003

Country wrote:
LMD wrote:
Sorry you feel that way, Country.

Let's let the investigation go forward and if any Marines are found guilty, justice should and will be served. Don't worry, if guilty these men will be punished severely.

Until then, Murtha should shut his big, whimpering mouth.

Any true Marine would.

Since you know what a "true Marine" is, I assume you served in the Corps? John Murtha volunteered to go to Nam and got a bronze star (with combat V) and two purple hearts while there. I wonder if you're fit to shine John Murtha's boots.

1) Murtha isn't worthy of my spit to shine his shoes.

2) I am the product of two "true Marines"; my mother, who served in WWII and my father - WWII through two tours in Vietnam.

He is highly decorated but you would never know it. And neither did I until, having had to become his Power of Attorney for reasons of his failing health, obtained his records.

My father proudly volunteered and humbly served for 30 years active duty (not 10 years active and 27 in reserves like Murtha).

The operative words in the above sentence are "humbly served". The word "humble" doesn't seem to fit the characterization of a Marine as a stand alone description, does it?

But combined with "served", you get the picture of the difference between a true Marine like my father and some finger-puppet, mouthpiece of the Dem party like a Murtha or a Kerry.

My father would NEVER publically speak out in the manner Murtha did. He had/has more dignity and respect than that.

3) I did not serve in the military, for a number of reasons. (I have always been upfront about this.) The desire was there; the health was not and my father, being much wiser than me did everything in his power to make me understand that I wouldn't cut the mustard. So, no, I did not serve.

Instead, I vowed after the Vietnam War to work tirelessly against the anti-war activists, such as Murtha and Kerry and any other people who shoot their mouths off as often as they can - in an attempts to destroy this country and the morale of the military.

It's not going to happen on my watch as long as I'm alive.

LMD
User offline. Last seen 30 min 54 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2003

Country wrote:
I been paying attention to Murtha since he said we should get out of Iraq. He's probably visited more people at Walter Reed (that are there because of Iraq) than anyone. I've heard him tell the stories of those visits. It's been getting to him. He knows combat and he knows what comes of it. Like the subject of this thread.. he said those Marines in Iraq lost it. He knows.

So, you must be equally impressed with the fact that Donald Rumsfeld goes and visits these soldiers on a weekly basis? Yes, he does. But, you probably aren't aware of that because the liberal rags won't cover it and Donald Rumsfeld doesn't mention it.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

LMD, until Murtha saw the results of going into Iraq, he was never anti-war that I know of. He's been one of the staunchest supporters of the military since he's been in the US House. Don't go lumping him in with Kerry. That's a cheap shot and you clearly don't know what you're talking about. Glad to hear of your folks' service. You don't have to have been a "lifer" to have served your country though. Most who lost their lives in Nam weren't.

LMD
User offline. Last seen 30 min 54 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 02/24/2003

Country wrote:
LMD, until Murtha saw the results of going into Iraq, he was never anti-war that I know of. He's been one of the staunchest supporters of the military since he's been in the US House. Don't go lumping him in with Kerry. That's a cheap shot and you clearly don't know what you're talking about. Glad to hear of your folks' service. You don't have to have been a "lifer" to have served your country though. Most who lost their lives in Nam weren't.

Country,
Try to let this sink into your head.

Murtha was not there during the incident in question.

Anything he has to say about it is SPECULATION.

As I stated in my original post, let justice work.

If the Marines are found guilty, they will be punished severely - not like some civilian who, say, kills an innocent woman by leaving her to drown in an overturned car iin the water off a bridge in Chappaqudick...and gets off scott-free. (And feel free to dig up any Republican who has done something similar - I would say the same thing.)

BTW, Murtha voted for the war before he voted against it. Check his voting record. Do your homework.

Murtha works on what is expedient for his political career, just like Kerry.

Murtha's medals have been called into question, just like Kerry's.

And, just like Kerry, when you run your life by touting your military career then you are fair game and subject to investigation.

Edited to add: - I never said you had to be a "lifer" to have served your country. Clearly you missed the point - AGAIN.
Murtha loves to spout off about his "37 year, highly decorated Marine career". I was comparing him to one of thousands of others who have served 30 years ACTIVE, not 10 years active and the rest reserves. And they don't mention a peep about it.

Murtha, by mouthing off, places himself in the limelight. Any publicity is good publicity. And this is exactly what this publicity-whore is looking for during an election year.

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 28 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

I wonder why Iraq is always brought up in the same breath as "Vietnam" by the left. Why don't they bring up "World War II" in the same breath?

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 28 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

I wonder how these IED devices get planted in front of a house and nobody sees them plant it? Funny how that happens.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

Bob, I don't think it has anything to do with the left, or right for that matter. Iraq is becoming a quagmire, just as Vietnam became one. And in both cases those wars weren't neccessary. In WWII it was neccessary that we got in.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

LMD, I guess we just see Murtha differently.. and I agree with him.

Bob Stone
User offline. Last seen 28 min 28 sec ago. Offline
Joined: 06/08/2003

In my opinion, Iraq was very necessary.

And Iraq is far from a quagmire.

The problem in Iraq is that there are a bunch of thugs, many religious zealots who think nothing of committing suicide and homocide against anyone, women and children included, who are idolized by the Western Media as "insurgents".

In Vietnam, we were fighting a cunning state sponsored army who wanted to take over a country.

The big difference in Iraq vs. Vietnam is that the North Vietnamese weren't about to, and didn't, follow us "home". In Iraq, the daffy zealots will. They have already "come for" about 3,000 people here.

And I don't buy, for a nanosecond, that crap that the Islamists had "nothing to do" with Saddam.

Country
User offline. Last seen 2 years 8 weeks ago. Offline
Joined: 05/31/2005

Guess we'll just have to wait and see about Iraq, Bob. Sure is looking like a quagmire to me at this point.